On 2008-02-06T08:58:46, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right. If there is enough demand, then we can just make the equivalent of
> ocf-shellfuncs for that language.
> autoconf makes this relatively straight forward, you just supply the
> template and it'll fill in the values.
Actually we will probably address this going forward with
Pacemaker/openAIS etc anyway. When we merge RAs, or want to be able to
host them all, we'll need a cleaner API.
Right now we have a OCF RA calling interface, but no set of common
functions; that seems to be something which would need to be extended in
the "specs".
Until then, relying on the "non-standard" stuff we provide and being
prepared to fix it when it breaks is probably the only choice ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
