On 2008-02-06T08:58:46, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right. If there is enough demand, then we can just make the equivalent of > ocf-shellfuncs for that language. > autoconf makes this relatively straight forward, you just supply the > template and it'll fill in the values.
Actually we will probably address this going forward with Pacemaker/openAIS etc anyway. When we merge RAs, or want to be able to host them all, we'll need a cleaner API. Right now we have a OCF RA calling interface, but no set of common functions; that seems to be something which would need to be extended in the "specs". Until then, relying on the "non-standard" stuff we provide and being prepared to fix it when it breaks is probably the only choice ;-) Regards, Lars -- Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) "Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems