Understood. Thanks for clarifying and the link to docs Andrew.
On 7/9/08, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 20:25, Raghuram Bondalapati > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, the failover of xinetd works fine when i replace xinetd binary > > with a binary from different Hardware architecture to simulate xinted > > startup failure even though no fencing resource is defined. > > > > However it does not failover if I change the permisisons on original > xinted > > binary to 000. Why is fencing resource needed in this case and not for > the > > above scenario. > > it depends on what your RA reported in both cases. > but one thing is for certain, the cluster cant fencing anything if you > dont give it any means to (by defining a stonith resource) > > > Can you please also point me to some documentation on setting up fencing > > resources. > > http://www.linux-ha.org/ConfiguringStonithPlugins > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
