On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:18 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:29:45PM -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > I have an IPaddr2 resource that is timing out.
> > 
> > Logs:
> > 
> > lrmd[29423]: 2008/09/02_18:41:08 WARN: internal_VIP:monitor process (PID 
> > 24658) timed out (try 1).  Killing with signal SIGTERM (15).
> > lrmd[29423]: 2008/09/02_18:41:08 WARN: operation monitor[25] on 
> > ocf::IPaddr2::internal_VIP for client 29426, its parameters: 
> > CRM_meta_interval=[5000] ip=[192.168.115.25] CRM_meta_id=[internal_VIP_mon] 
> > CRM_meta_timeout=[5000] crm_feature_set=[2.0] CRM_meta_name=[monitor] : pid 
> > [24658] timed out
> > crmd[29426]: 2008/09/02_18:41:08 ERROR: process_lrm_event: LRM operation 
> > internal_VIP_monitor_5000 (25) Timed Out (timeout=5000ms)
> > 
> > cib.xml:
> > 
> > <primitive id="internal_VIP" class="ocf" provider="heartbeat" 
> > type="IPaddr2">
> >   <operations>
> >     <op id="internal_VIP_mon" name="monitor" interval="5s" timeout="5s"/>
> >   </operations>
> >   <instance_attributes id="internal_VIP_inst_attr">
> >     <attributes>
> >       <nvpair id="internal_VIP_ip_assignment" name="ip" 
> > value="192.168.115.25"/>
> >     </attributes>
> >   </instance_attributes>
> > </primitive>
> > 
> > I have looked through the IPaddr2 RA and cannot find anyplace
> > in the monitor code that would be taking anywhere near 5 seconds
> > to complete.
> 
> Busy host? Something somewhere with name resolution or network?
> This seems to be the only external program invoked:
> 
> ip -o -f inet addr show
> 
> Can't think of anything else.
> 
> Yes, five seconds may be too excessive, but you should still
> allow for higher timeouts.

Suppose I want to see what the average time is for completion of monitor
events, is that possible?

I am curious what the completion time is under high load. Also, it would
be good to determine the timeout value that is larger than 99.9999% of
the monitors. I know I could set it to 600 seconds, but that seems
excessive, I would rather have educated values.

Thanks,

-- 
Matt Zagrabelny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (218) 726 8844
University of Minnesota Duluth
Information Technology Systems & Services
PGP key 1024D/84E22DA2 2005-11-07
Fingerprint: 78F9 18B3 EF58 56F5 FC85  C5CA 53E7 887F 84E2 2DA2

He is not a fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot
lose.
-Jim Elliot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems

Reply via email to