On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 19:37 +0200, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: > > Suppose I want to see what the average time is for completion of monitor > > events, is that possible? > > Afraid not. Though there's an enhancement request for that. > > > I am curious what the completion time is under high load. Also, it would > > be good to determine the timeout value that is larger than 99.9999% of > > the monitors. I know I could set it to 600 seconds, but that seems > > excessive, I would rather have educated values. > > Of course. Well, something like 15 or 20 seconds should fit the > bill. If it goes higher than that then perhaps it should be > considered to be an outage. That depends on your > setup/users/services. Of course, there's no hard rule on what do > on high host load.
There are times when the load is around 40, these are the times when a timeout of 30s is not enough. Currently I have very little monitoring. Actually *no* monitoring of resources and only a couple of ping nodes. If a monitor does not return when the monitor interval occurs, is a second monitor action spawned? Such as: (interval = 15s, timeout = 30s) second 0: first monitor occurs [no response] second 15: is a second monitor action spawned? [still no response] second 30: timeout occurs This question is for educational purposes. Thanks, -- Matt Zagrabelny - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (218) 726 8844 University of Minnesota Duluth Information Technology Systems & Services PGP key 1024D/84E22DA2 2005-11-07 Fingerprint: 78F9 18B3 EF58 56F5 FC85 C5CA 53E7 887F 84E2 2DA2 He is not a fool who gives up what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose. -Jim Elliot
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
