Hello Sorry about the vagueness of this post: I don't have all of the log files to hand at this moment. I have a two node HA cluster on SLES 10 SP2 (64 bit). I am having problems getting the riloe plugin to work properly. The riloe script works fine when run it from the command line (i.e. when I run "riloe status" I get a RC of 0). But when I run the riloe from a clone resource the resource will not start and the ha-log indicates an error and a RC of 6 - I think the error indicated an empty "hostlist" which is not actually true as this parameter is definitely populated. Having read through the riloe script I cannot see anywhere that it returns a RC of 6 so I don't know where that is coming from? I saw another post that requested a full list of return codes (and meanings) for stonithd but I don't know if this was ever answered? Funny thing is I have two nodes (let's say A and B), each with a HP ILO. There are two clone resources, one for each ILO and for each clone I have set clone_node_max = 1 and clone_max = 2. The stonith resource for ILO-B starts on node A but the stonith resource for ILO-A will not start on node A - they use the same riloe plugin and it works when run manually? Note that node B has not been built yet (i.e. no OS) but it is powered on. This behaviour (of stonith for ILO-A not being allowed to run on node A alone) might be entirely by design, but I don't think it is documented so it is confusing me greatly. If I change the "hostlist" parameter of the ILO-A clone to be something other than "A" then it runs fine - so this seems to support this notion but I was just trying to get some feedback from the mailing list on this. I suppose it is reasonable that stonith won't run of it is only able to suicide and no other node can kill it but if the return codes were documented or this behaviour was identified in the documentation it would make things so much easier. Of course I might be barking up the wrong tree and there may be another reason for stonithd for ILO-A on node A not starting and if anyone has any ideas it would be much appreciated. Simon
Network Ten Pty Ltd ABN 91 052 515 250 Network Ten Disclaimer. This e-mail (including all attachments) is intended solely for the named addressee. If you receive it in error, please let us know by reply e-mail, delete it from your system and destroy the copies. This e-mail is also subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the written consent of the copyright owner. E-mails may be interfered with, may contain computer viruses or other defects and may not be successfully replicated on other systems. We give no warranties in relation to these matters. If you have any doubts about the authenticity of an e-mail purportedly sent by us, please contact us immediately. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
