Hi,
Thank you for your comment.
By the way, this is the tips for LVM RA...
It is possible to prevent the warning from LVM command,
like "File descriptor 3 (socket:[375969]) leaked on vgdisplay invocation.
Parent PID 18253: /bin/sh"
if we set "LVM_SUPPRESS_FD_WARNINGS" in LVM RA.
--- /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/LVM.org 2009-07-03 18:04:06.000000000
+0900
+++ /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/LVM 2009-07-03 18:02:03.000000000
+0900
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
# Initialization:
. ${OCF_ROOT}/resource.d/heartbeat/.ocf-shellfuncs
+export LVM_SUPPRESS_FD_WARNINGS=1
#######################################################################
We can get through the LVM's warning message with this way for a while if our
customer don't want to apply the patch at once.
Thanks,
Junko
On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:50:16 +0900, Dejan Muhamedagic <deja...@fastmail.fm>
wrote:
> Hi Junko-san,
>
> On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 04:37:44PM +0900, Junko IKEDA wrote:
>> Hi again, :)
>>
>> Thank you for your quick reply.
>> Our customer might hesitate to apply the new patch for their running system
>> at once.
>
> Of course.
>
>> (I don't know their upgrade plan unfortunately)
>> So I want to know whether Heartbeat can run safely without your patch for a
>> while.
>
> Definitely.
>
>> I know that we should recommend the latest code, of course. :)
>
> Yes.
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
