Il giorno Mer 02 Giu 2010 08:59:01 CET, Florian Haas ha scritto: [...] > That is incorrect. It does handle everything it is supposed to handle, > but it appears that exportfs (the binary) isn't doing what its man page > says it does: exportfs -u is supposed to "shut down all NFS activity" on > the export affected. Which to me would mean that the NFS daemon would > also relinquish any open server-side NFS file handles. Apparently, at > least for your system, it doesn't.
Ok, the problem is that I've tried the solution on Debian Lenny and Ubuntu 9.10 and 10.4 and it's the same story. >> I patched the script to do a nfsd restart, based upon what the RA >> nfsserver do. In this way, things works, but seems a little bit ugly... >> I'm going to do some tests and then post the patch. > That is intrusive; it affects _all_ exports, not just the one this > exportfs resource is managing. As such it isn't any better than nfsserver. Of course, I never stop saying it was ugly :-) > We have been discussing this on the list for several weeks now, and are > still looking for the best way to fix this. This is also the reason why > exportfs isn't part of any resource-agents release yet. > Lars (Ellenberg), could you comment on this please? > Cheers, > Florian That is true. I'll give to Lars's solution a try, he suggests to put noatime on the server side filesystem mount. For the rest, my configuration is identical to his one. Thanks, -- RaSca Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente รจ impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene! ra...@miamammausalinux.org http://www.miamammausalinux.org _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
