On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikes...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/10/2010 1:54 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote: >> Les Mikesell wrote: >> ... >>> What I >>> wanted was advice on the best platform that had a packaged, re-usable >>> setup available that was likely to be maintained in updates for a long >>> time. >> >> There's a bit of problem with your requirement: you forgot "supported". >> As in try getting any support here for version of heartbeat that ships >> with RHEL 5 (or Suse 10, as I understand). > > I'm not looking for support for my local environment. I'm looking for a > version that is reusable and works without local hacks. Or whatever > might be expected to work for a long time into the future if set up now. > But I suppose not changing interfaces wildly would be part of that > requirement so a packager can maintain it.
You still didn't tell what you are building. I have a cluster of 2 nodes running 2 instances of Apache for 3 years already. OS CentOS 5.5, Pacemaker + Heartbeat. Upgraded it couple of times without any issues. Is it long enough? I also support a couple of other clusters on CentOS 5.5. > > -- > Les Mikesell > lesmikes...@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > -- Serge Dubrouski. _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
