On 02/14/2011 04:45 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Ulrich Windl
> <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
>>>>> Andrew Beekhof<and...@beekhof.net> schrieb am 14.02.2011 um 10:08 in
>>>>> Nachricht
>> <aanlktinuc9_oqpwjubxrdmqkncqvnqx68a_1kbqss...@mail.gmail.com>:
>> [...]
>>>> The log just keeps on saying:
>>>> Feb 8 16:01:03 dmcs2 pengine: [1480]: WARN: cluster_status: We do not have
>>>> quorum - fencing and resource management disabled
>>> Exactly.
>>> Read that line again a couple of times, then read "clusters from scratch".
>> [...]
>>
>> Which makes me wonder: Can a one-node-cluster ever have a quorum?
> Not really, which is why we have no-quorum-policy.
>
>> I think a one-node-cluster is a completely valid construct. Also with
>> Linux-HA?
> Yep.
If you're using the Heartbeat membership stack, then it is perfectly
happy to give you quorum in a one-node cluster.
In fact, at one tmie I wrote a script to create a cluster configuration
from your /etc/init.d/ scripts - so that Pacemaker could be effectively
a nice replacement for init - with a respawn that really works ;-)
--
Alan Robertson<al...@unix.sh>
"Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim
from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
