On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Alan Robertson <al...@unix.sh> wrote: > On 02/14/2011 04:45 AM, Andrew Beekhof wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Ulrich Windl >> <ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote: >>>>>> Andrew Beekhof<and...@beekhof.net> schrieb am 14.02.2011 um 10:08 in >>>>>> Nachricht >>> <aanlktinuc9_oqpwjubxrdmqkncqvnqx68a_1kbqss...@mail.gmail.com>: >>> [...] >>>>> The log just keeps on saying: >>>>> Feb 8 16:01:03 dmcs2 pengine: [1480]: WARN: cluster_status: We do not >>>>> have >>>>> quorum - fencing and resource management disabled >>>> Exactly. >>>> Read that line again a couple of times, then read "clusters from scratch". >>> [...] >>> >>> Which makes me wonder: Can a one-node-cluster ever have a quorum? >> Not really, which is why we have no-quorum-policy. >> >>> I think a one-node-cluster is a completely valid construct. Also with >>> Linux-HA? >> Yep. > > If you're using the Heartbeat membership stack, then it is perfectly > happy to give you quorum in a one-node cluster.
Or a two node cluster. Which is not exactly ideal. > In fact, at one tmie I wrote a script to create a cluster configuration > from your /etc/init.d/ scripts - so that Pacemaker could be effectively > a nice replacement for init - with a respawn that really works ;-) > > > -- > Alan Robertson<al...@unix.sh> > > "Openness is the foundation and preservative of friendship... Let me claim > from you at all times your undisguised opinions." - William Wilberforce > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-HA mailing list > Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org > http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha > See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems > _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
