On 2013-04-30T13:58:02, Richard Comblen <richard.comb...@kreios.lu> wrote:
> Now, a new requirement shows up: the two nodes should be connected
> using two physically separated networks, and should survive failure of
> one of the two networks.
>
> The two nodes communicate together for PostgreSQL replication.
>
> Initially, the slave will communicate with the master on network 1,
> and if network 1 fails, it should switch to network 2.
Use unicast for corosync and configure quagga with OSPF with a linkdown
time faster than the token timeout in corosync.
> Obviously, I cannot use a virtual-ip over two different networks. What
> would be the closest solution in term of features ?
You can use a virtual IP; the routing protocol will take care to keep it
reachable.
> Do you have suggestion on a better way to achieve these requirements ?
I've not tried the above in awhile, but it worked 13 years ago and I
assume it still would. ;-)
Regards,
Lars
--
Architect Storage/HA
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB
21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
