Hi,
As I know the main diference is that glibc (GNU libc) has some functions
more than the standard libc.
The glibc was done by the GNU ppl to suport a GNU generation of libc and
to provide a few more tools for developers.
I think gcc is the main "user" for glibc, since CC just uses the
standard libc (and gcc may use that too, without problems)
I develop my softwares libc based... so it may be ported to any platform
without GCC.. or glibc. (how many platforms suports AX.25 ? :-)
Regards
Linux
PS: glibc is just standard on redhat systems... i guess
--
DISCLAIMER:
This article may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. Do not insert
this article into the ear canal. Not responsible for injuries due
to reading this article while showering. Prolonged inhalation of
fumes from this article may result in nausea, dizzyness,
convulsions, and death. Do not operate a motor vehicle, heavy
equipment, or power tools while reading this article. Dispose of
this article in a responsible manner when finished reading. No
warranties expressed or implied. May *not* be suitable for
children under 32. Discontinue reading this article if skin rash
appears, or vision blurrs, and consult a physician.
If there Is a God, YOU are an AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.
Do whatever you seem necessary and appropriate.
PS:
One thing I have no worry about is whether God exists. But it has
occurred to me that God has Alzheimer's and has forgotten we exist.
