On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:41:52AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 7:32 PM Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > It really should be the actual physical state change that triggers the > > event. > I guess so, but this would require some non-trivial rework of the > regulator core. We'd need some list of deferred notifications stored > in memory for when the physical state actually changes. I'm not sure I see the need for deferred notifications? We'd need to go round all the users whenever a physical change to the GPIO happens but it's not clear what we'd need to store beyond the list of users?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
