On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 04:42:11PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 4:08 PM Mark Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I'm not sure I see the need for deferred notifications? We'd need to go > > round all the users whenever a physical change to the GPIO happens but > > it's not clear what we'd need to store beyond the list of users? > In my mind I was thinking that we only need to send the notifications > to users who already enabled/disabled the regulator too but you're > right, it seems like a loop over the relevant pins should be enough. Ah, great - yeah, I'd expect notifications either way just to be on the safe side. > In any case: this is outside the scope of this series but I'll see if > it's easy enough to add separately. Yes, definitely outside the scope of the series. If you do something that'd be great but no pressure.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
