On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 12:04:14PM +0300, Dmitry Antipov wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-02-04 at 16:31 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > In case you would need a v6, we can leave some of the lines untouched if we
> > switch to for-loop instead of while, but it might make the for-loop quite
> > long.
>
> Hmm...the for-loop might be:
>
> for (res = 0, rv = 0; max_chars--; rv++, s++) {
res = 0 should be left outside, it's not part of the for-loop iterators.
> ...
> }
>
> and it makes _parse_integer_limit() a few lines shorter.
Yes, but more disruption on the code, so there are pros and cons,
but if you decide to go with it in v6, I won't object.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
