Linux-Hardware Digest #616, Volume #12 Wed, 5 Apr 00 10:13:06 EDT
Contents:
ATA66 PROBLEMS?? SOLUTION HERE
Re: Partition -Boot problem. ("Scotty")
Re: CDRECORD *shmget failed* (Agrezar)
Re: COM1 or COM2 for the ext. modem; whats optimal? (Jan Panteltje)
Re: Where is my 128 MB RAM gone? ("Chris L.")
Re: PCMCIA!!! (Alessandro Giachino)
multi-cpu motherboard for Athlon, any? (Eros Albertazzi)
Re: Need a clean hard disk ("Jake")
bttv: readee error, no picture but sound (Thomas)
unholy floppy problems! (Rubin)
Parallel Printer Port ("Russell")
Re: high altitude modern systems performance ("Pat Crean")
LOW-low level debugging ("Breton M. Saunders")
Re: Sound card problem: Ensoniq ES1371 audio PCI-97 chip set ("Peter T. Breuer")
Re: COM1 or COM2 for the ext. modem; whats optimal? ("Sebastian Kaliszewski")
Re: I-opener and linux: 128meg really helps! (Bryan)
Re: multi-cpu motherboard for Athlon, any? (Bryan)
ScanMaker X6 parallel port version under linux? ("Jan H. Meinke")
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ATA66 PROBLEMS?? SOLUTION HERE
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 11:25:57 GMT
This is for the Highpoint and Promise ones...
Step one: Get the latest kernel (currently 2.3.51 but 2.4 will have it)
Step two: Compile and install
Step Three: Your hda will be hde unless you compile the pci ide controller as ide0 and
ide1 adn motherboard ones aas ide2 and ide3 so you will have to change lilo and fstab.
Step Four: Reboot and watch it work if you did everything right.
--
Brad R ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
------------------------------
From: "Scotty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.os.beos
Subject: Re: Partition -Boot problem.
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 11:31:46 GMT
Pop in a windows 98 boot disk and boot up.
type in "fdisk /mbr"
This i think rebuilds the mbr.
Hope this helps.
Scotty
Den Zoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I'm trying to triple boot, Win98, Mandrake 7 and BeOS-5-PE.
> My hard drives are as thus,
> 16.8 gig IBM HD 2 partitions:
>
> C:(2gigs primary with windows98 installed)
> D:(14gigs extended w/ fat 32)
>
> 3.2gig IBM HD 4 partitions:
>
> /boot/ (Primary 10meg linux ext2)
> /home/ (extended 2gigs linux ext2)
> /swap/ (extended 170megs linux swap)
> /BeOS (primary 780megs Be )
>
> I can't get Be or Linux to load from Bootman, only Windows!!!
> I cant get LILO to boot at all...(corrupted MBR!!!)
>
> what am I doing wrong, can someone give me an Idea what I'm doing wrong
> and how to rebuild my MBR???
>
> Thanks...
> dennis
>
>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Agrezar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CDRECORD *shmget failed*
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 11:43:54 GMT
root wrote:
> Ok, I am new at this stuff, but I am fairly experienced when it comes to
> the pc. Now, If I do a fresh install of Linux 6.2 I can get the writer
> to work without a fail. When i compile a new kernel to impliment my
> Promise Ultra66 everything seems to go well, I can even see my HP 8200i.
> IF I try to, lets say blank a CD-RW (which i have done with a fresh
> install successfully) I get this error
>
> [root@24 /root]# cdrecord dev=0,0,0 -blank=all
> Cdrecord 1.8 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Jörg Schilling
> cdrecord: Invalid argument. shmget failed
>
> Now I did a man on shmget, and I am assumeing by what i was reading that
> it has to do with a memorey allocation problem. Is there something I am
> forgetting to compile into the kernel? Has anyone else had this
> problem.. and by chance do tehy know how to fix it? I have been
> searching for the answer for awhile, even redid the system..
>
> here is "cdrecord -scanbus"
>
> Cdrecord 1.8 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Jörg Schilling
> Using libscg version 'schily-0.1'
> scsibus0:
> 0,0,0 0) 'HP ' 'CD-Writer+ 8200 ' '1.0f' Removable CD-ROM
> 0,1,0 1) *
> 0,2,0 2) *
> 0,3,0 3) *
> 0,4,0 4) *
> 0,5,0 5) *
> 0,6,0 6) *
> 0,7,0 7) *
>
> Cdrecord 1.8 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2000 Jörg Schilling
> scsidev: '0,0,0'
> scsibus: 0 target: 0 lun: 0
> Using libscg version 'schily-0.1'
> Device type : Removable CD-ROM
> Version : 0
> Response Format: 1
> Vendor_info : 'HP '
> Identifikation : 'CD-Writer+ 8200 '
> Revision : '1.0f'
> Device seems to be: Generic mmc CD-RW.
> Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R driver (mmc_cdr).
> Driver flags : SWABAUDIO
>
> The kernel I am useing is 2.3.99-pre3 (It has all the nice little toys i
> want for my PIII550 and Asus P3C2000)
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated! :) Thx!
>
> Phil.
ahhh found the problem!!!
You have to add this mount in your fstab.
none /var/shm shm exec,dev,suid,rw 0 0
(just incase you run into the same problem!!! Cheers! :)
Phil
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan Panteltje)
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips
Subject: Re: COM1 or COM2 for the ext. modem; whats optimal?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 11:43:17 GMT
>On Tue, 4 Apr 2000 12:23:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jan
>Panteltje) wrote:
>
>> No this is not correct, on a serial channel (with a small (usually) FIFO),
>> there are many interrupts per second.
>
>Ok, how many? There are *many* instructions per second too.
>
>> If for example the HD, or an other IDE device has a higher priority servicing
>> the interrupt, you may (and will) loose data.
>
>Hogwash! Even a 286 could keep up with a 16550 at full tilt.
>This isn't a biggie.
>
>> In linux ifconfig (do it every now and then while downloading) will show
>> your packet loss, now this might just come as a shock if it is not zero.
>> packet loss on a http connection may cause the connection to break.
>
>Sheesh! Packet loss is 99.44% communications errors. I've
>*never* seen an under/over-run with a modern computer. THis has
>zip to do with the processor or UART.
>
>> I have been (and am) experimenting with this stuff, also set
>> hdpar -u 1 (unmask ) interrupts for all IDE devices, to improve things.
>> remember only 0 (zero) packet loss even over a million packets is good.
>
>Whoopie. THis isn't the cause of the losses. Poor phone lines
>or overly agressive modems are. There is somethign to be said
>for overly-agressive modems though. In any case packet losses
>aren't unusual and are no cause for alarm. I've never seen one
>that was caused by an interrupt priority problem though.
>
>> Of cause I have had download speeds of 12.5 kB per second on com 2 with etech bullet
>> V90 external, but this includes compression, and was on vrml files.
>
>So? Whoopie. THis is perfectly normal for compressed data (it
>would be impossible without compression). Any packet losses
>would be caused by a crappy pnone line anyway.
>
>> Linux 2.0.30
>> Now with the newer kernel and glibc 2.1 on Redhat, the ppp is a BSD ???
>> not such good results.
>> Oh, sorry and the 12.5 kB / second was on a 486 DX 2 66 ;-)
>> Now windows on the k6-2 450 is not so bad either, but I have not found out
>> how to optimize things yet...
>
>I guess not.
>>
>> I have published 'how I did it' in the past on the modem groups form demon.uk.
>> For those who are into it, the doc that come with irqtune (faq) is very good too.
>
>Whoopie. Now, what did you say that's so important!? If you
>believe that you're losing data because of lost interrupts you
>are a sad puppy. ...just what is it you're selling?
>
>----
> Keith
>
I think you could be more polite.
Also you are simply wrong, as I spend considerable time and effort testing these
thing out.
But of cause you have tried Linux and hdparm settings and their influence,
also you have tried Linux and irqtune and its different settings,
please report your data and the hardware used?
For now I have to assume you are only talking no hands on experience with linux.
Try for a couple of years.
The other thing that irqtune will improve is mouse response (serial mouse on com)
in X.
On some mobos the mouse cursor would be difficult to move (wandering).
Setting irq priority high would improve that.
Now how many interrupts does the 1200Bd mouse generate ????
LOL, you do not have a clue as to what really happens!
Jan
------------------------------
From: "Chris L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Where is my 128 MB RAM gone?
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:20:04 -0500
I also had to set my bios to "OS/2 type operating system" for anything more
than 64M to be seen so you might want to check that also in addition to
"mem=128M"
Good luck and God bless,
Chris
Kris Luyten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8c9dvc$fg$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can anybody help me with this one: I have a PC with 128 MD RAM and I am
> using the latest Mandrake release. When I boot Microsoft it detects 128 mb
> ram, but when I boot Linux it only detects and _uses_ 64 mb ram. I NEED
the
> 128 mb because I am using JBuilder foundation for Java development while
> working with PostGres (on Linux of course) and JBuilder (with the JRE)
eats
> lots of RAM.
>
> My configuration: AMD Athlon 600 Mhz.
> 128 MB RAM (like mentioned :-)).
> ASUS K7M motherboard.
> Matrox G400 Millenium Max.
>
>
> Thanx, Kris
>
>
------------------------------
From: Alessandro Giachino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: PCMCIA!!!
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 12:14:13 GMT
This old laptop doesn't have enough room. I'll have to uninstall
most of the Windows stuff on it before I start then.
Bob Martin wrote:
>
> EKK wrote:
> >
> > Does RedHat's site actually serve a purpose?
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > does the RH6.1 pcmcia-RHEA-1999:044.img boot image actually work?
> >
> > it gives me a blank list of drivers to pick from when I boot from
> > this image on my laptop!
> >
> > the only other option is to try "linux supp" with
> > RH6.0 which means I would first have to install RH6.0 and
> > then upgrade to RH6.1.
> > This also fails miserably.
> >
> > The PCMCIA card I have is a 3Com589D, fully supported.
> >
> > None of the combinations of commands suggested by RH on their site
> > seems to work.
> >
> > Please feedback anyone who has gotten this to actually work.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > AG
> > --
>
> For what it's worth, I never got RH 6.x to install from CD on my laptop
> with a pcmcia CDROM ( 5.2 installed flawlessly ). I got around it by
> creating a DOS partition, copying the RedHat directory from the CD to
> there, then doing a HD install.
> --
>
> Bob Martin
------------------------------
From: Eros Albertazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: multi-cpu motherboard for Athlon, any?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 14:24:01 +0200
Are there any multi-cpu motherboard for AMD Athlon?
--
Eros Albertazzi
CNR-LAMEL, Via P.Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
Tel: (+39)-051-639 9179
Fax: (+39)-051-639 9216
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Jake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To:
alt.comp.hardware,comp.os.linux.setup,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.setup.hardware,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
Subject: Re: Need a clean hard disk
Date: 05 Apr 2000 08:32:59 EDT
I doubt the /s would be needed.
Jake
"hartmut.piechowiak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:8cesgb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> format c: /q /u/s
>
------------------------------
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas)
Subject: bttv: readee error, no picture but sound
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 14:58:28 +0200
Hi,
I'm getting mad by trying to get a Haupauge WinTV (Radio) Card running.
I get no picture(xawtv, kwintv), sound and channel scanning is working
well.
I'm using the bttv-0.6.3-66
The var log messages looks good (the hardware is recognized well,
all other modules are starting well)till I load the bttv modul:
-> 'readee error'
I have played arround with several bttv options (card=10 .....) without
success.
I doesn't madder if I use the kernelloader or load the moduls by hand (in
the correct order)
The Overlay of the vga card is recognize correct as reported in the
prov/pci.
An additional vidmem doesn't success.
I have compiled readee anew .
Starting it by hand prints the contense of the eeprom (or a part og it ?)
on the screen (>tvee.h made), AND add the readee error line to messages.
I test the card under win95 in the same computer and unfourtunately it
works :-\
P100 , FX Board, S3 TRIO 64 1024x768x16
Any ideas ????
--
Xbye
Thomas
To reply via Mail remove the _ at the mail address !
------------------------------
From: Rubin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.os.linux.alpha
Subject: unholy floppy problems!
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 15:09:42 +0000
Hi all,
I have Debian 2.2 frozen on an alphaxl266. everything works fine, kernel
2.2.14 is running right now but i am unable to mount any floppies! it
doesn't matter what format, it just won't mount! (cdroms work fine,
b.t.w) check this output:
foo:/home/user# mount -vt auto /dev/fd0 /floppy
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/fd0
I will try all types mentioned in /etc/filesystems or
/proc/filesystems
Trying vfat
Trying msdos
mount: you must specify the filesystem type
...and this one:
foo:/home/user# mount -vt <insert your fs here> /dev/fd0 /floppy
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/fd0,
or too many mounted file systems
this seems to have started since i updated to 2.2 (kernel and debian).
/etc/fstab seems to be fine too:
/dev/fd0 /floppy auto noauto,users,exec,suid 0 0
again, it doesn't matter if i replace "auto" with <any fs here>
...finally, all modules are loaded! (floppy, msdos, vfat, fat).
If anybody can shed any light on this, i'd be very grateful ;)
Thanks,
Rubin.
------------------------------
From: "Russell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Parallel Printer Port
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 23:33:08 +1000
I want to print in linux, I've used printtool, printtool shows that nothing
is being detecting on my parallel port, which is where my printer is, how do
i get linux to recognize my parallel port.
thanks in advanced
------------------------------
From: "Pat Crean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: alt.comp.hardware.homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.systems
Subject: Re: high altitude modern systems performance
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2000 09:35:52 -0400
I'd be more inclined that you've got over heating problems --- fans don't
work real well when the air gets too thin <grin>
"Kenneth Mankoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello everyone,
> I live at 10,000 feet and have had all systems newer than a 486DX33Mhz
> computer fail me. Since november, this is:
>
> * 3 Dell Inspiron 7500 latptop motherboards (450Mhz). 2 months to failure
> * 3 Dell Inspiron 7500 hard drives (12 to 18 gig). 2 months to failure.
> * one gateway latop internal modem. 3 days to failure
> * one 200 Mhz (overclocked) Gateway tower (2 days, then writing to zip and
> floppy drive in linux failed)
>
> Running for days (and years):
> 486 DX 33Mhz desktop
> 286 5Mhz desktop
>
> I know airplane computers have radiation sheilds. I also know i have a 3%
> higher chance of cancer than the average altitude of the global population
> (or maybe it was sea level)
>
> I'm grasping at straws, but hoping some of you may have experience with
> high altitude computing, or can point me to a resource.
>
> thanks in advance,
> ken.
>
------------------------------
From: "Breton M. Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: LOW-low level debugging
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 14:44:53 +0100
Hello All,
I've got an annoying problem: My linux laptop crashes when running
XFree86 4.0. The problem is that the machine totally locks up. I am
fairly confident that the problem lies in the Cyber9397 driver causing a
bus lock-up.
I want to debug this problem, because I am sick and tired of waiting
for e2fsck.
On the Amiga I used to be able to load a debugger and invoke it
through a NMI. Is there anything similar for linux, so that after my
computer is totally shafted I can interrupt the machine and get the
processor doing something again (like running a debugger)?
Where can I find information on low level debugging of device drivers?
-Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Sound card problem: Ensoniq ES1371 audio PCI-97 chip set
Date: 5 Apr 2000 13:39:28 GMT
Elaine Wenderholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I cannot get my Sound card to work! I'm running SuSE Linux 6.3.
: I just recently purchased a Dell Dimension. I have:
: 3com c3509B ISA ethernet card.
: Soundblaster 64V PCI Sound Card
: 32 MB NVidia tnt2 M64 graphics card (it isn't plug and play)
: This is what I did:
: (0) Checkted that the board is seated properly and that the wire from
: the board to the
: CD-ROM is attached.
: (1) lspci -vvt to get the chip set
: (2) rm conf.modules
: (3) edited /etc/modules.conf:
: commented out:
: # alias char-major-14 off
: # alias sound off
: # alias midi off
: uncommented lines under es1371
As far as I recall, the SB64PCI is a 1370, not a 1371.
: (4) modprobe *
Modprobe what in particular?
: (5) enables system sounds in KDE | Settings | Sound | System Sounds
: (6) rebooted
Why? The whole point of using modprobe and modules is so that you
don't have to reboot to install or uninstall drivers!
: (7) no sound! even though the correct module is installed.
No it isn't, surely. And you haven't convinced me of it at any rate!
DO
modprobe es1370
lsmod
dmesg | tail
Peter
------------------------------
From: "Sebastian Kaliszewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Crossposted-To: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc
Subject: Re: COM1 or COM2 for the ext. modem; whats optimal?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 13:56:05 GMT
Jan Panteltje wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>No this is not correct, on a serial channel (with a small (usually) FIFO),
>there are many interrupts per second.
Up to ~15000 times per second, and service delay of slighly over 1ms is
acceptable (buffer is 16 bytes long). In properly written PC software
nothing should lock the interrupts for longer than 1ms. Current CPUs could
execute over 100000 instructions during that time.
>If for example the HD, or an other IDE device has a higher priority
servicing
>the interrupt, you may (and will) loose data.
Only if driver is poorly written, and locks the interrupts for longer than
1ms. And even if the loss rate is completely insignificant. (See below for
more).
>In linux ifconfig (do it every now and then while downloading) will show
>your packet loss, now this might just come as a shock if it is not zero.
>packet loss on a http connection may cause the connection to break.
Until you only occasionaly loose packets, taht's non issue. Http uses TCP
protocol which corrects packet loses untily the loss number is too high.
(Too high means 30% or more).
>
>I have been (and am) experimenting with this stuff, also set
>hdpar -u 1 (unmask ) interrupts for all IDE devices, to improve things.
>remember only 0 (zero) packet loss even over a million packets is good.
It's impossible on most normal phone lines. Even on Ethernet packet loss
rate is greater. Difference between 0 and 1 per 1000 packet is not noticable
by anyone. I'm not remember that exactly, but TCP would automatically retry
not less than 3 times before giving up an breakin the connection. If 1 per
1000 packet is lost and retry count is opnly 3 (it's probably higher, but I
don't remember) then on average 1 reqest per 500 would fail, and because of
3 replies one gets 1 per 125000000 failures (in case of 5 retries before
giving up it's 1 per 31250000000000). Since one packet is ~512 bytes that
means one broken link per 64000000000 (over 60GB) download (in case of 5
retry treshold its roughly 1 per 15PB=1024*15TB (PetaBytes) failure). Thus
that's a non issue. The isue is with overloaded skeneton internet routers,
where packet loss often exceeds 10% or even 30%. But it has nothing to do
with interrupt priorites within your PC.
Regrads
Sebastian Kaliszewski
--
"Never underestimate the power of human stupidity" - from Notebooks of L.L.
------------------------------
From: Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: I-opener and linux: 128meg really helps!
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 13:58:46 GMT
Mark Bratcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Bryan wrote:
: >
: > just as an fyi, my kernel build HALVED when I went from the stock
: > 32meg sodimm to a 128meg stick. from a half hour (2.2 series) to 15
: > minutes.
: >
: > add the winchip2 as an upgrade and I'm hoping it will be less than 10 minutes.
: >
: > so the rumors of the i-opener NOT using more than 64meg are a lie.
: > run 'free' and it does show 128meg.
: What kind of processor do you have? I have a Pentium II 233MHz (don't
: laugh), 64MB of SDRAM, and a 5400rpm 6GB Quantum hard drive, and I can
: build the 2.2 kernel in 13 minutes (that includes building modules).
the iopener (http://i-opener-linux.net/) uses a crappy winchip c6.
the easiest upgrade is the winchip2 ($25) which I have on order.
supposed to give almost a 2x boost in most ops.
your p2-233 should blow away my setup. my drive is a notebook drive (slow).
but, as always, unless we're using the exact same kernel options, our
builds aren't comparable. I was posting this as info to other iopener
users that the 128meg ram upgrade is very worthwhile.
--
Bryan, http://Grateful.Net (ANTISPAM: email is my name at my web's domain)
(c) 2000. Publishing and/or relaying of this material on all forums other than
USENET implies agreeing to a consultancy fee of US$150 per posting. You must
obtain a written permit before you publish. Violators are subject to civil
prosecution for Copyright Infringement as applicable. Publication by C|NET
and Microsoft Networks expressly prohibited.
------------------------------
From: Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: multi-cpu motherboard for Athlon, any?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 14:01:43 GMT
not as of yet. maybe in 6 months or so, some will show up in consumer
channels.
Eros Albertazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: Are there any multi-cpu motherboard for AMD Athlon?
: --
: Eros Albertazzi
: CNR-LAMEL, Via P.Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy
: Tel: (+39)-051-639 9179
: Fax: (+39)-051-639 9216
: E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Bryan, http://Grateful.Net (ANTISPAM: email is my name at my web's domain)
(c) 2000. Publishing and/or relaying of this material on all forums other than
USENET implies agreeing to a consultancy fee of US$150 per posting. You must
obtain a written permit before you publish. Violators are subject to civil
prosecution for Copyright Infringement as applicable. Publication by C|NET
and Microsoft Networks expressly prohibited.
------------------------------
From: "Jan H. Meinke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ScanMaker X6 parallel port version under linux?
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 09:57:50 -0400
Hi,
I have the parallel port version of the ScanMaker X6. Is there a way to
get it to work with linux?
The scanner uses a SCSI emulation under Windows, so I would assume that
it still uses the SCSI protocol internally. I also know that the SCSI
port version is supported by SANE.
Any help would be appreciated.
Jan
------------------------------
** FOR YOUR REFERENCE **
The service address, to which questions about the list itself and requests
to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, is:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can send mail to the entire list (and comp.os.linux.hardware) via:
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux may be obtained via one of these FTP sites:
ftp.funet.fi pub/Linux
tsx-11.mit.edu pub/linux
sunsite.unc.edu pub/Linux
End of Linux-Hardware Digest
******************************
