On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 09:44:20AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote: > Thanks. If that symbol is referenced only by these few lines, I'd > go with something even shorter and simpler. Perhaps: > > .section .discard.addressable,"aw" > .align 8 > .type vtl_return_sym, @object > .size vtl_return_sym, 8 > vtl_return_sym: > .quad __SCK____mshv_vtl_return_hypercall > > Regardless of the choice of symbol name, add a comment about > mimicking __ADDRESSABLE(). That feels less messy to me, but > it's Naman's call.
Right, that'll work.
