On 11/12/2025 3:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 09:44:20AM +0000, Michael Kelley wrote:
Thanks. If that symbol is referenced only by these few lines, I'd
go with something even shorter and simpler. Perhaps:
.section .discard.addressable,"aw"
.align 8
.type vtl_return_sym, @object
.size vtl_return_sym, 8
vtl_return_sym:
.quad __SCK____mshv_vtl_return_hypercall
Regardless of the choice of symbol name, add a comment about
mimicking __ADDRESSABLE(). That feels less messy to me, but
it's Naman's call.
Right, that'll work.
Thanks Michael, Peter and Paolo for your inputs.
I'll use a simpler name and add a comment to explain it.
Regards,
Naman
