On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:34:49AM +0000, Chew, Chiau Ee wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w...@the-dreams.de] > > Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2014 5:04 PM > > To: Chew, Chiau Ee > > Cc: Mika Westerberg; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] i2c: designware-pci: set ideal HCNT, LCNT and SDA > > hold time value > > > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 10:12:51PM +0800, Chew Chiau Ee wrote: > > > From: Chew, Chiau Ee <chiau.ee.c...@intel.com> > > > > > > On Intel BayTrail, there was case whereby the resulting fast mode bus > > > speed becomes slower (~20% slower compared to expected speed) if using > > > the HCNT/LCNT calculated in the core layer. Thus, this patch is added > > > to allow pci glue layer to pass in optimal HCNT/LCNT/SDA hold time > > > values to core layer since the core layer supports cofigurable > > > HCNT/LCNT/SDA hold time values now. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chew, Chiau Ee <chiau.ee.c...@intel.com> > > > > Can you make use of those instead? > > > > u32 sda_falling_time; > > u32 scl_falling_time; > > > > This is more consistent with using sda_hold_time and lets them have a common > > (and more readable) unit. > > Would like to clarify on your statement above. So you are suggesting to > change the following > variable name in the code? As in:
Nope. But I had a look and it doesn't make sense to use the above. So, just forget it :) Will send a second review.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
