On 3/13/07, Jay Lan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 28 Feb 2007 07:38:55 +0800, Zou Nan hai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
[excessive text deleted]
>> So it is better to fix and clean up those issues.
>> Calculate min_low_pfn and max_low_pfn in a consistent way.
>>
>> Below is the patch, please review and comments
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zou Nan hai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I've seen similar problems on a HP rx2620 box using 2.6.20. I managed
> to resolve that problem with a patch similar to this one, but then I
> realized that the issue I was seeing had been solved already by some
> mm-related patch by Bob Picco that got included in 2.6.21-rc1.
I tested on 2.6.21-rc3 with DEBUG_VM turned on. The vanilla 2.6.21-rc3
without Nan-hai's patch, panicked on bugcheck on free_initmem->free_page
as predicted. We still need this patch.
Ok, thanks for testing. =)
However, the zero-size vmcore problem is back on SN. But that is a
dfiffernet problem.
Argh, more problems...
/ magnus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
