Jay Lan wrote: > Magnus Damm wrote: > [snip] >>> I tested on 2.6.21-rc3 with DEBUG_VM turned on. The vanilla 2.6.21-rc3 >>> without Nan-hai's patch, panicked on bugcheck on free_initmem->free_page >>> as predicted. We still need this patch. >> Ok, thanks for testing. =) >> >>> However, the zero-size vmcore problem is back on SN. But that is a >>> dfiffernet problem. >> Argh, more problems... > > I found the problem. It was the "elfcorehdr" introduced in 2.6.21-rc1. > Without specifying it, the elfcorehdr_addr is initialized to > ELFCORE_ADDR_MAX. Later, a check in reserve_elfcorehdr will fail: > if (elfcorehdr_addr >= ELFCORE_ADDR_MAX) > return -EINVAL; > > Is it supposed to be a physical address to store elf core header? > If so, it is not possible for SN to provide a physical address at > boot time, just like in the case of [EMAIL PROTECTED] where Y is not used.
Sorry, the elfcorehdr parameter is provided to the kdump kernel by kexec. The problem is in the reserve_elfcorehdr logic introduced in 2.6.21-rc1. When booting up the kdump kernel, i observed a failure in reserve_elfcorehdr. The below are my debugging messages: elfcorehdr_addr=3027fe4000, ELFCORE_ADDR_MAX=ffffffffffffffff Cannot locate EFI vmcore descriptor reserve_elfcorehdr: vmcore descriptor size = 0 reserve_memory: FAIL to reserve reserve_elfcorehdr - jay > > Thanks, > - jay > > >> / magnus >> - >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in >> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ia64" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
