05_sil24_mdelay-instead-of-udelay.patch
loop 100 times with mdelay(1) instead of 1000 times with
udelay(100) in sil24_reset_controller.
Jeff, is this what you wanted? If not, just ignore this
patch. The following patches will apply without this one.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
sata_sil24.c | 10 +++++++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: work/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c 2005-07-30 19:13:40.000000000 +0900
+++ work/drivers/scsi/sata_sil24.c 2005-07-30 19:13:40.000000000 +0900
@@ -445,9 +445,13 @@ static void sil24_reset_controller(struc
writel(PORT_CS_DEV_RST, port + PORT_CTRL_STAT);
readl(port + PORT_CTRL_STAT); /* sync */
- /* Max ~100ms */
- for (cnt = 0; cnt < 1000; cnt++) {
- udelay(100);
+ /*
+ * Max ~100ms.
+ * FIXME: 100ms is an arbitrary value, get spec and use
+ * accurate value.
+ */
+ for (cnt = 0; cnt < 100; cnt++) {
+ mdelay(1);
tmp = readl(port + PORT_CTRL_STAT);
if (!(tmp & PORT_CS_DEV_RST))
break;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
