> > The other IT821x change is a bit ugly, we slightly abuse the cable type > > hook to fiddle with the identify data for the devices. We could add a new > > hook for this but as we have only one offender and no more seeming likely > > it seems better to keep libata-core clean. > > > > Please let this sit in -mm briefly, just in case the relaxed checking > > breaks some other emulated interface. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Two questions: > > 1) should I queue for 2.6.24-rc?
Can we leave it once cycle in -mm and aim for 2.6.25-rc. There is a tiny possibility we will find someone who finds slave returning 0 produces a ghost drive or decode problem. Probably paranoia. > 2) why is ->dev_config() insufficient? It is called (I think correctly) after we have performed identify dependant actions including HPA sizing. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
