On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 11:03, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Shlomi Fish wrote: > > > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Ely Levy wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Diego Iastrubni wrote: > > > > > > > Here is my opinion: any one of this 3 sounds cool. I put here only the > > > > downsides of each approach. > > > > > > > > gtk: > > > > * not object oriented (looks un-natural to build gui's in no oop language) > > > > * looks funkey on win32 > > > > > > > > qt: > > > > * not free in win32 > > > Actually it is now. > > > > > > > Free as in speech? I don't think so. Care to enlighten us? > > Isn't it dual licensed as GPL/QPL? Doesn't GPL mean free as in > speech? >
Don't know QPL and correct me if I am wrong, but I think that programs that include GPL code have to be released under GPL license in which case you can only use qt under windows for open source software as a free toolkit (has its points I admit. If you are going to earn money for you program, you might as well pay for the usage of the toolkit). Although I believe that if you use dynamic linking you can still mix GPL and closed source (as you are not actually including the source in you program). Thats whats supposed to enable distributing closed source kernel modules. > > Regards, > > > > Shlomi Fish > > > > > > > Ely > > behdad > > ================================================================= > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command > echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Micha Feigin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
