Quoting Dotan Cohen, from the post of Fri, 06 Jun: > 2008/6/6 Ira Abramov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Quoting Dotan Cohen, from the post of Tue, 03 Jun: > >> decision. Maybe the ETK/GTK/Qt decision is not arbitrary, but from > >> here it certainly seems so. > > > > don't blow it out of proportions either. it does come with GTK, just > > that the DEFAULT IMPLEMENTATION of the interface is not GTK. you can > > (and people probably have) implement it again in GTK with BiDi. > > You try running two toolkits at once on a 400 mHz processor with 128 > MB RAM, tell me how well it runs, then we'll discuss the option.
a. this was exactly my point about adding in QT support, it made no sense adding a fourth toolkit to a platform that may already be overloaded with 3. b. like I said REIMPLEMENT. the platform comes with three toolkits, but the basic apps runs on the least rich of the three (no doubt because it's the leanest). However if you live in a country that needs RTL and other features, no one is stoping you from implementing all those base apps in a different toolkit to add those fetures. In fact I have no doubt somewhere someone already started. that was you use a heavier toolkit, but can use it for everything. -- Fighting for a lost cause Ira Abramov http://ira.abramov.org/email/ ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
