Hi, linux il gurus, According to recent item in cnet, "SanDisk said Monday that Windows Vista is not optimized for solid-state drives, delaying the delivery of optimized drives until next year."
see: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-9996317-64.html My question is this: I know that the ONLP project uses FLASH drives. This probably gave some push for developing FLASH filesystems for Linux. what is the state of Linux regarding SSD ? I heard that there are three file systems which are candidates in Linux for SSD drives: One is UBIFS, and the second is LogFS, and the third is JFFS2 (and there are talks about JFFFS3). On the F9 I am running, there is support to jffs2. There is no support for ubifs and no LogFS (what I mean relates to installing the distribution as it is, without any further patching/installing). I see that in the linux-next tree, however, there is support for ubifs (I did not see support for LogFS). My question is this: What is the status of Linux regarding SSD drives? Does anybody has any experience with these filesystems ? Which is the preferred filesystems among these three ? Is ubifs better than LogFS? Regards, DS ================================================================= To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command echo unsubscribe | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
