On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 06:31:56AM -0500, Binand Sethumadhavan wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:04:12 +0530, Arjun Asthana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - - Debian vs RH vs Mandrake vs SuSE vs... > > > > Every distro has it's plus and minus points. Debian is easily upgradable and > > thus is good for a normal user. RH is the worst (IMHO). But the Mandrake > > guys > > have done a lot of work to make it better. > > I'll bite on this. What sort of normal users did you have in mind? > > If you are claiming RH is the worst to upgrade, then you are talking > through your hat. Have you ever tried upgrading RH to make such a > sweeping statement? IMO, RH upgrade is by far the most flawless and > mature upgrade option among all Unix systems. > > Binand >
I wouldn't say that RH upgrades are the worst, but apt-getting is much easier than anything else, I'd say. My fellow Debian (desktop) users have coined the phrase "Debian is for upgrade; upgrade is for Debian: both are synonymous with each other." Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ linux-india-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-india-help
