On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Anssi Hannula wrote: > > I'd of course happily merge the fix which initializes the value > > properly into my tree, but I would be curious what broke it, to double > > check that we didn't break anything else along with it. > Okay, I'll get back to you in a few days :)
Hi Anssi, did you make any progress here please? I am going to merge the patch, still I'd be understand what caused it (on the other hand from Diogo's last comment it doesn't seem 100% certain that we cased it somewhere around 2.6.20). Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina
