On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 27 September 2007 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > mechanism the same way the version for generic hid does. In fact, it is
> > > only necessary because there's no nice API call for setting
> > > needs_remote_wakeup.
> >
> > That's okay; even if there were a nice API call for setting
> > needs_remote_wakeup you would still have to call
> > usb_autopm_get_interface(). This is because we don't keep track of
> > whether or not remote wakeup is currently enabled on a suspended
>
> Is it worth doing so?
If enough drivers need it. ("Enough" might mean >= 1.)
Alan Stern
