Am Donnerstag 27 September 2007 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > mechanism the same way the version for generic hid does. In fact, it is
> > only necessary because there's no nice API call for setting
> > needs_remote_wakeup.
>
> That's okay; even if there were a nice API call for setting
> needs_remote_wakeup you would still have to call
> usb_autopm_get_interface(). This is because we don't keep track of
> whether or not remote wakeup is currently enabled on a suspended
Is it worth doing so?
Regards
Oliver
