Hello,
Olaf Flebbe wrote:
>On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, Fons Botman wrote:
>> That still needed to be changed. I will make it into a commandline
>> parameter, because I am not sure what the "right" value is. Was is just my
>> Psion5 or are other P5's also slow in responding?
>I did not test other parameters... What do you mean by slow in
>responding? In respect to typing in text while receiving?
Depends on how fast you type :-}
I ment the discovery slot timeout, the standard specifies 80ms, but the psion seems to
require more because the replies to the XID:CMD frames arrive sometimes after 120ms.
You can see this with irdadump -d
When the psion is discovering itself it uses a slightly higher value than 80ms.
>...
>I tested it with a 5mx (Unfortunatly, it is not my own ;-(. I got a
>speed of 11 KByte/sec while beaming my perl.sis to the 5mx. (I only
>got 8 KBytes to a Psion 5).
I got better values (10KB/s) as I remember, I will measure again. Have you enabled
FAST_RR on Linux?
>It may work with other EPOC devices. Maybe irepoc may be a better name.
Good candidate. Would you use in on newer devices? I understand the P5MX uses IrOBEX
which is preferable I think.
>But wait! On both Psion5 and Psion 5mx, you may receive files that
>are too short.
Try the attached patch please. This bug in the program turned up in later versions of
the stack.
>http://www.fortunecity.de/wolkenkratzer/trumpet/84/perl/perl_10.zip
Does this work well?
Thanks,
Fons Botman
diff.txt
