Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok. I had planned to take a look at how the WinBond 83977 driver works, and
> use that as some sort of template. Is this all wrong, should I instead sit
The Winbond driver does not use irport
> back and wait for your progress or is there another driver I should take a
> look at to learn the workings of the new irport?
irport is the same old one, and things must be changed so that it can be
used by other drivers. And these drivers will haveto be changed as
well. It's such a mess that it's almost easier to insert all the code into
the driver itself (almost like the winbond driver ;-)
> (Or maybe I should just look at irport itself, but before I had learned the
> way anything worked, you'd be done with the SMC driver and a bunch others
> as well.. :)
Please have a look, and I'll send you a mail when I have a patch that fixes
the problem with using irport from another driver. Then we can both work on
the SMC driver ;-)
-- Dag
--
/ Dag Brattli | The Linux-IrDA Project /
// University of Tromsoe, Norway | Infrared communication for Linux //
/// http://www.cs.uit.no/~dagb | http://www.cs.uit.no/linux-irda/ ///
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www4.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
