Hi!
> > I hope that people understand that we must be _very_ careful with what goes
> > into Linux-IrDA at this moment. A CVS style development _will_ definitively
> > screw things up! If people suddenly joins and wants to contribute, then
> > ...
>
> As a non-contributing lurker, I must say that from what I've seen
> a slightly different policy may be needed for releasing patches
> as I get the feeling that the frequency and stability of patches
> is a concern and that some people on the list are getting
> confused and frustrated.
I'm also a non-source-contributing reader of this list and actually can't
understand the worries going on here. Dag is writing this faboulus stuff in his
spare time, for free. As with everything: You get what you pay for!!
My approach for not being disappointed by breaking patches or similar things:
Wait for a patch to ripe two, three days. If there isn't a patch-patch out by
that time, it's considered stable from my side.
This also covers the fact that I don't have the time to apply EVERY patch Dag
releases.
Just my EUR 0.02
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Linux-IrDA mailing list - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www4.pasta.cs.UiT.No/mailman/listinfo/linux-irda
