On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 12:37:04PM +0100, Keith Bennett wrote: > On Sun, Jul 30, 2006, EV wrote: > > 2006-07-30: Bob Copeland dixit: > > > [...] > > > An aside: are there any remaining major issues before we > > > release libkarma 0.0.5 on the world? > > > > I also think libkarma is already ripe for 0.0.5 > > Agreed, although there are some small things that need changing first. > I will implement authenticate() and request/release_io_lock() as no-ops > in karmaUsb this evening. That will finish off all the items on the > TODO list. > > We could either release new versions of lkarmafs and libkarma now and > fix that afterwards or delay the release of both until after this is > fixed.
My preference would be that 0.0.5 be released sooner rather than later (with the no-ops above) and save any API changes for the next version. We should probably rev it to 0.1.0 for that second release. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
