On Mon, Jul 31, 2006, Bob Copeland wrote: > > We could either release new versions of lkarmafs and libkarma now and > > fix that afterwards or delay the release of both until after this is > > fixed. > > My preference would be that 0.0.5 be released sooner rather than later > (with the no-ops above) and save any API changes for the next version.
Agreed. > We should probably rev it to 0.1.0 for that second release. Actually, the lkarmafs fix only needs *additions* to the API rather than changes. I should have been clearer on that point. So that shouldn't require a major revision increment. However, I would like to make some fairly major changes to the API in order to unexpose the properties list altogether. That will certainly want to wait until after the release and will warrant a major revision change. I also want to change the underlying data structures. Keith. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
