Hi Joe, I've just seen the changes introduced in changeset 128 which correspond to your post:
2007-01-02: Joseph Nahmias dixit: > [...] Also, I made some changes to the Makefiles that I would > like to discuss with Frank mostly relating to the install > process. See the attached diff. While I understand the changes are good from a (debian) packaging point of view, I don't like some of the changes. For local instalation from source (as I think is the case for most of us), I want to get the tools compiled with libkarma.a, rather than libkarma.so. This allows checking the correctness of each new version before full instalation, without having to correctly install the libraries somewhere or bothering about shared library paths, etc. Up to some point, the makefiles had a target for compiling the tools with the shared lib. I think we should restore this target and leave the default make as it was before changeset 128. Of course, other opinions are welcome! Best, EV. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ linux-karma-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-karma-devel
