[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthias Andree) writes:

>Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>> Since 2.2.17 isnt out yet I've released 2.2.18pre1 versus 2.2.17pre20. So 
>> you need to grab 2.2.16 then apply the 2.2.17pre20 patch then the 2.2.18pre
>> patch of choice.

>Well, I'm asking again, as usual, are you planning to integrate
>kernel-space NFSv3? I'd appreciate if you did.

I support this request. It was promised since 2.2.13 to finally get a
working NFSv3 in the official kernel tree but it was always pushed
back further by "more important things" like driver updates and VM
changes...

I know that it is futile but getting LFS and RAID 0.90 would be nice,
too.  Especially as 95+% of all Linux users (which use a distribution
kernel) already _have_ 0.90 RAID and the last 5-% are able to patch
the old driver theirselves.

At least as a config option? CONFIG_NEW_RAID vs. CONFIG_OLD_RAID? Alan, if
you accept such a patch, I would generate one vs. 2.2.18pre1

        Regards
                Henning
-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen       -- Geschaeftsfuehrer
INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH     [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Am Schwabachgrund 22  Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D-91054 Buckenhof     Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20   
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to