> What I'd like to add is: while we're at it, how about losing the 512 > byte magic multiplier and go with the filesystem block size? That way > Ext2 file size automatically goes up by a factor of 8 every time we > manage to double the filesystem block size (blocksize*2 and triple > indirect => 2**3). Except that there is no guarantee (or probability) that the ext2fs is aligned at the disk level on a 4K granularity boundary - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Large File support and bl... Michael Meissner
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Large File support and bl... Michael Meissner
- Re: Large File support and bl... Matthew Jacob
- Re: Large File support and bl... Richard Henderson
- RE: Large File support and blocks. Richard B. Johnson
- RE: Large File support and blocks. Linda Walsh
- RE: Large File support and blocks... Mark Hahn
- Re: Large File support and blocks. Stephen C. Tweedie
- 512 byte magic multiplier (was: Large File support and ... Daniel Phillips
- Re: 512 byte magic multiplier (was: Large File sup... Alan Cox
- Re: 512 byte magic multiplier (was: Large File sup... Alexander Viro
- Re: 512 byte magic multiplier (was: Large File... Daniel Phillips
- Re: 512 byte magic multiplier (was: Large ... Theodore Y. Ts'o