Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2000 21:32:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Andrew Morton wrote: > > gcc -O2 -c t.c > > strings t.o | grep hhh > hhhhhhh Eww... Do they _ever_ remove dead code? They remove the code, they just forget to mark the string in the data section as unused and thus still emit it. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integra... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about int... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how a... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Martin Dalecki
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Kai Henningsen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Mike A. Harris
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how a... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / ... Richard Gooch