Chris Wedgwood wrote: > I think would be really cool if all this 'magic' in gcc (whatever > part of gcc is irrelevant right now) would be exported into a library > or shared object which editors could then load and use... dynamically > perhaps. Sorry, there's a GCC policy decision against putting it into a shared library. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Andrew Morton
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Linus Torvalds
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Kai Henningsen
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Mike A. Harris
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Richard Gooch
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Peter Samuelson
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Jonathan Walther
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... David Woodhouse
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about in... Jamie Lokier
- Re: 2.4.0-test8-pre1 is quite bad / how about integrating... Nix