On Thu, 21 Sep 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> How did you get away with adding a new member to task_struct yet
> not updating the INIT_TASK() macro appropriately? :-) Does it
> really compile?
There are a lot of fields in the task_struct which
do not have fields declared in the INIT_TASK macro.
They seem to be set to zero by default.
regards,
Rik
--
"What you're running that piece of shit Gnome?!?!"
-- Miguel de Icaza, UKUUG 2000
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- [patch *] VM deadlock fix Rik van Riel
- Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix Roger Larsson
- Problem remains - page_launder? (Was: Re: [patc... Roger Larsson
- Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix David S. Miller
- Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [patch *] VM deadlock fix David S. Miller
- test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock during writ... Rik van Riel
- test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock during ... Molnar Ingo
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock... Molnar Ingo
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock... Rik van Riel
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM dea... Molnar Ingo
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM... Molnar Ingo
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatc... Rik van Riel
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatc... Andr� Dahlqvist
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatc... Andr� Dahlqvist
- test9-pre3+t9p2-vmpatch VM... Yuri Pudgorodsky
- Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatc... Mohammad A. Haque

