Re: test9-pre5+t9p2-vmpatch VM deadlock during write-intensiveworkload

[Molnar Ingo]

On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:

>  894          if (current->need_resched && !(gfp_mask & __GFP_IO)) {
>  895                  __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
>  896                  schedule();
>  897          }

> The idea was to not allow processes which have IO locks
> to schedule away, but as you can see, the check is 
> reversed ...

thanks ... sounds good. Will have this tested in about 15 mins.

        Ingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/