On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 05:02:36PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Here's a gem of a claim from the main WAFL patent: > > "20. The method of claim 8 further comprising the step of using one or > more of said read-only copies of said file system to back-up said > blocks comprising one or more consistency points of said file system." > http://innominate.org/~phillips/wafl.patent.5819292.html > > I may be interpreting this incorrectly, but this seems to say that they > claim proprietary rights to making a backup from a checkpoint. also sounds very similar to [one use for] lvm snapshots. does hp-ux have those too? (linux lvm documentation seems to say it [lvm] was based on a similar hp-ux feature...) j. -- john slee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Thomas Davis
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted john slee
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Chris Good
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Ion Badulescu
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Thomas Davis
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Rik van Riel
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Matti Aarnio
- RE: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Marty Fouts
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Daniel Phillips
- Re: Tux2 - evil patents sighted Daniel Phillips