On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > I'd prefer just X having a higher "mm nice level" or something. > > Which it has, because: > > 1) CAP_RAW_IO > 2) p->euid == 0 Oh, I agree, but we might want to generalize this a bit so that root could say "this process is important" and then drop root privileges and still get "credited" for the fact that it's important. It's not a big deal. It works for X right now. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Aaron Sethman
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Marco Colombo
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Linus Torvalds
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jim Gettys
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Olaf Titz
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Miles Lane
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler Jamie Lokier