On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:06:49AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > If you want init to live - prove that it don't eat too much memory. I don't see why the machine should be stable only if init is small. My kernel won't be stable only if init is small since it doesn't cost anything to handle correctly the big init case. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9... Ingo Oeser
- [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Tom Rini
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Tom Rini
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OO... David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9... David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9... Philipp Rumpf
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler James Lewis Nance