Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 09:06:49AM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote: > > If you want init to live - prove that it don't eat too much memory. > > I don't see why the machine should be stable only if init is small. > My kernel won't be stable only if init is small since it doesn't cost > anything to handle correctly the big init case. > Nothing wrong with a big init - the problem is a memory-leaking init. That one will die anyway, wether it dies early from an OOM-killer or later when all other processes are gone don't really matter. Helge Hafting - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... Jamie Lokier
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9... Ingo Oeser
- [PATCH] OOM killer API (was: [... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Ingo Oeser
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Tom Rini
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] OOM killer API (wa... Tom Rini
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OO... David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9... David Ford
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Rik van Riel
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 &... Alan Cox
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9... Philipp Rumpf
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-t... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handler James Lewis Nance
- Re: [PATCH] VM fix for 2.4.0-test9 & OOM handle... Rik van Riel