>Well, at first, I wanted to implement it the same way on PPC. However, it >dies on all occurences where udelay is called with a non-constant expression. > >I spotted this case in a few PPC specific stuffs (fixable), but also in >the sys_nanosleep code, and in the de4x5 driver. Hrm... looks like I missed the story about the __builtin_constant_p(). Is this a gcc-specific built-in feature ? Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Marcelo Tosatti
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Marcus Sundberg
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Alan Cox
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Ralf Baechle
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Alan Cox
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre... Alan Cox
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.1... Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- RE: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Chris Swiedler
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Andreas Schwab
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Alan Cox
- Re: __bad_udelay in 2.2.18pre15 Horst von Brand