> - RH 7 ships kgcc for compiling the kernel, as the 2.2 kernels are known to > be broken and not compilable with new gcc's > - No, the kernel won't be fixed. The work is huge, and the risk is much too > high Actually I take the same attitude I took with 2.95. If you submit patches which fix cases where stuff got overoptimised or has wrong constraints I'll apply them but I still wont recommend using that gcc to build it Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new... David S. Miller
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new add... Adrian Bunk
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new add... Alan Cox
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new add... Alexander Viro
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS... David Woodhouse
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 ... Alan Cox
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(te... Byron Stanoszek
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 ... Jakub Jelinek
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 P... Horst von Brand
- Problem: lp usage count in 2.4.0test8 Alan Cox
- Problem: lp usage count in 2.4.0test8 Ralf Sinoradzki
- Re: Problem: lp usage count in 2.4.0test8 Ralf Sinoradzki
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(tes... Gnea
- Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI resou... jamal
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(te... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(te... jamal
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WA... Linus Torvalds