On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, jamal wrote: > > This is in addition to the debug statements from the previous email > Weirder results (like bus 0x0a) Ok, thanks - this part didn't get anything new, the bus numbers are just different due to the re-allocation, the actual bus windows are the same broken ones. I wonder why they are so broken. And why did 2.2 work? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9... Horst von Brand
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(t... Alan Cox
- Problem: lp usage count in 2.4.0test8 Ralf Sinoradzki
- Re: Problem: lp usage count in 2.4.0tes... Ralf Sinoradzki
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(t... Gnea
- Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI res... jamal
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition ... jamal
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new additi... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(... jamal
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition ... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test9 PCI... jamal
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(test... Linus Torvalds
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition WAS(... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition ... Martin Mares
- Another test10 PCI resource conflict Vitaly Luban
- Re: Another test10 PCI resource co... Matt Porter
- Re: Updated 2.4 TODO List -- new addition ... Linus Torvalds