On 10/19/2015 04:18 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 15:08:27 -0700 Mike Kravetz <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
>> The hugetlbfs fallocate hole punch code can race with page faults.  The
>> result is that after a hole punch operation, pages may remain within the
>> hole.  No other side effects of this race were observed.
>>
>> In preparation for adding userfaultfd support to hugetlbfs, it is desirable
>> to plug or significantly shrink this hole.  This patch set uses the same
>> mechanism employed in shmem (see commit f00cdc6df7).
>>
> 
> "still buggy but not as bad as before" isn't what we strive for ;) What
> would it take to fix this for real?  An exhaustive description of the
> bug would be a good starting point, thanks.
> 

Thanks for asking, it made me look closer at ways to resolve this.

The current code in remove_inode_hugepages() does nothing with a page if
it is still mapped.  The only way it can be mapped is if we race and take
a page fault after unmapping, but before the page is removed.  This patch
set makes that window much smaller, but it still exists.

Instead of "giving up" on a mapped page, remove_inode_hugepages() can go
back and unmap it.  I'll code this up tomorrow.  Fortunately, it is
pretty easy to hit these races and verify proper behavior.

I'll create a new patch set with this combined code for a complete fix.

-- 
Mike Kravetz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to